<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Voice is changing within the Enterprise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simonleyland.com/2009/04/voice-is-changing-within-the-enterprise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simonleyland.com/2009/04/voice-is-changing-within-the-enterprise/</link>
	<description>Simon&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:56:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DuncanBlake</title>
		<link>http://www.simonleyland.com/2009/04/voice-is-changing-within-the-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>DuncanBlake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonleyland.com/?p=126#comment-411</guid>
		<description>Simon, it&#039;s an interesting take on the nomenclature for VoIP, as a distinct technology seperate from UC. I agree with your conclusions, but did have a moment of cognitive disonance before I twigged to your usage/definitons. 

The doc is a simple but powerful presentation, but can you provide sourcing for the graphs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simon, it&#8217;s an interesting take on the nomenclature for VoIP, as a distinct technology seperate from UC. I agree with your conclusions, but did have a moment of cognitive disonance before I twigged to your usage/definitons. </p>
<p>The doc is a simple but powerful presentation, but can you provide sourcing for the graphs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philipp</title>
		<link>http://www.simonleyland.com/2009/04/voice-is-changing-within-the-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Philipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 09:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonleyland.com/?p=126#comment-44</guid>
		<description>True, voice must no longer be considered a stand-alone technology. But as an integral part of any UC solution, VoIP is going to be an important communication technology for enterprises.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, voice must no longer be considered a stand-alone technology. But as an integral part of any UC solution, VoIP is going to be an important communication technology for enterprises.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
