Archive | September, 2010

Sametime Blog: What’s in the name?

Good blog by the Sametime team today on product names.  I really like the Sametime name, it’s a strong name.  It’s just a shame the software is as close to dead in the marketplace as possible, which goes to show the name of a product has almost nothing to do with what business value the software can bring.

Sametime blog here

Popularity: 1% [?]

GE Smart Patient Rooms – Goes Live

GE are investing significant amounts of investment into Telemedicine, epecially focused around monitoring the patient and getting the data back quickly to clinicians.  GE’s Healthcare’s website doesn’t go into too much detail but I do know that internally GE Healthcare are large users of OCS so it would be interesting to know if there has been any cross development.

The recent HealthcareIT article can be found here

GE Healthcare’s Smart Patient Room pilot at Bassett Medical Center has been approved by the site’s Institutional Review Board to begin data collection. The technology, installed as part of GE’s healthymagination initiative, aims to help providers reduce patient safety risks and improve outcomes.

“GE is developing a unique solution for the healthcare industry that helps hospitals and staff identify and mitigate patient safety risks while offering meaningful solutions to improve patient outcomes,” said Jan De Witte, president and CEO of GE Healthcare Performance Solutions. “GE’s real-time, adaptable solution will provide actionable data to healthcare providers regarding patient safety and potential medical errors, which in turn will affect the necessary behavioral changes to avoid preventable errors.”

Popularity: 1% [?]

Google Apps march on with 55k seat win

It’s still early days for the Google Enterprise team and they no doubt have a small market share if you take a look at the market place today.  Wins such as Ahold however provide Google with the beachhead to attack Microsoft’s dominance.  As I have said before if Google are not on your organisation’s 2 – 5 year strategy and architecture roadmap then you are behind the curve.  That doesn’t mean to say Google is the answer but they certainly have to be evaluated and if necessary used as a mechanism to reduce cost of other competitors.

The other big element of Google winning large deployments is that it gives the internal Google service teams experience of migrating, deploying and managing enterprise services.  Such skills are not easily acquired and often take several years of  internal development before becoming effective.

Ahold, an international food retailing group based in the Netherlands, that operates leading supermarket companies in Europe and the United States, including Albert Heijn, Albert / Hypernova, Stop & Shop, Giant Food and Giant Food Stores has gone Google. Ahold has over 2,900 stores around the world with a local presence in the communities they serve.

Ahold made the decision to move to Google Apps to provide its global workers with a single web-based platform for communication and collaboration, replacing Ahold’s existing email domains and systems in Europe and the US. Ahold chose Google Apps for its 25 GB of storage per account, integrated IM (Google Talk) and a series of additional features that facilitate communication, including video based communication tools, automatic translation and shared calendars.

The global deployment of Google Apps will bring a number of benefits to Ahold employees, among them:

  • Consolidation and standardization to a single mail system and global address book
  • Improved productivity through the use of efficient e-mail and instant messenger tools, as well as powerful personal and shared calendars
  • Training support with new video based communication tools, including video IM
  • Improved collaboration within and between operating companies and functions
  • Improved international communication with features such as automatic Message Translate, allowing users to translate e-mails from and into different languages with one click of the mouse or real-time translation in Google Talk.
  • Popularity: 1% [?]

    Avaya Desktop Video Communicator, seriously $2000?

    I do not understand why Cisco and Avaya are bringing dedicated tablets to market.   Are they just trying to ride the Apple hype cycle?  Unless they can beat the iPad or the plethora of Android tablets due to hit the market they should just stop wasting money investing in a device that they can not compete with.  Why would an Enterprise choose a $2000 or $1000 tablet when the market is set at around $500? what is the USP?

    Maybe I’m just missing something.  I’d love to see the use case where the Avaya or Cisco tablet could be deployed which can not be serviced by either the iPad or an Android device.

    Popularity: 3% [?]

    Anesthesia now via video conferencing

    Found by @SteffWatson. The Hindustan Times highlights another example of how unified communications can facilitiate effecient ways of deploying healthcare to patients.  In this example a research team have explored ways to deliver Anesthesia to remote areas of Canada via video conferencing.

    In a world first, doctors at McGill’s Department of Anesthesia treated patients undergoing thyroid gland surgery in Italy remotely via videoconferencing from Montreal on August 30 (10). Dr. Thomas Hemmerling and his team used the approach, which is part of new technological advancements, known as

    ”Teleanesthesia”. And the new approach involves a team of engineers, researchers and anesthesiologists who will ultimately apply the drugs intravenously which are then controlled remotely through an automated system.

    The article can be found here.  This is very similar to the Cisco Telemedicine deployment in Russia mentioned last week.

    Popularity: 1% [?]

    Microsoft Lync RC available to download

    Microsoft have today made their latest version of OCS available to download as a Release Candidate.  Although I have not seen anything offical from Microsoft yet it seems that Lync will be the new product name for their OCS software.

    If you download and install you have until Febuary 20th 2011 to evaluate Lync within a Lab environment.  Download here

    Lync is Microsoft’s third generation of software to attack the Unified Communications market place and is being positioned by them as a fully featured PBX replacement, as well as providing the most comprehensive feature set available within a single product in the UC market today.

    Popularity: 1% [?]

    Android set to be 2nd largest mobile OS: what next?

    Google may not yet be monetizing Android but they are laying a huge platform for future growth.  Microsoft built a multi billion annual business off the back of Windows. If Google can replicate their mobile success story in the browser and PC market they may well be set to take some of those billions off of Microsoft.  Within a couple of years we will have Android TV’s, Phones, PCs and probably any other device that requires an OS.  Android Cars anyone?

    What does this mean for Enterprise?

    I believe the consumer market is now a leading indicator for Enterprise IT.  Google and Android are still very much on an Enterprise learning curve but they are coming and more fundamentally the principles that Google deploy (cloud with an open client platform) will prove just as important as other vendors look to mimic their offer.

    IT is going to go through significant change in the next 2 – 5 years.  Here are some of the trends that I think will become evident:

    • The need to support multiple base operating systems.  IT shops typically understand Server and Client OS and like to standardise as much as possible.  Well not only will they need to add Mobile OS to the mix, they will also have to manage multiple OSs – Apple, Microsoft, Blackberry, Symbian and Android.
    • They can do this however because the client and mobile platform will be relatively generic with all the intelligence located in the cloud.
    • Middleware providers such as Good should earn good money in the transistion from single client OS to multiple OS and cloud.  During the transition IT shops will need middleware to enforce standards.
    • IT shops will need significantly less people within infrastructure and a more than likely a different supplier mix.
    • I’m not sure the outsourcing model as we know it today will survive.
    • Money saved on people costs and outsource arrangements will be invested in a number of different areas:
      • application development that generates true value to the business.
      • fund the demand for network bandwidth that will explode over the next five years
      • improve front line helpdesk services

    So a fascinating time is set for Enterprise IT, CIOs that can react quickly to the new IT industry will add business value and create competitive advantage, those that don’t will not only disadvantage their own career but also the business they serve.

    Popularity: 1% [?]

    UK Government scrap National IT Healthcare Scheme

    The UK government today brought an end to the national IT healthcare scheme stating that IT decisions should be made at a local level.  The £12billion programme has received significant criticism since inception for increasing costs, limited functionality and poor delivery.  I have never worked directly in the programme so can not comment on these criticisms but I do have several questions.

    Will there be a central set of standards published that all health providers must adhere to?  To give an example all health organisations will eventually deploy Instant Messaging and Presence.  Given that all the health organisations need to communicate will there be a central standard?  What happens if a surgery has Sametime, a hospital has Jabber and the trust has OCS?  Without central standards the IT provision within the system we be chaotic.

    How will de-centralised costs be tracked?  While centralised costs by their very nature create large top line figures that can attract significant attention.  De-centralised costs are extremely difficult to track and monitor, how will we know that the health organisations are procuring effectively?

    Again no idea if this is the right thing for the UK government to do, I just hope they understand the ramifications of their decisions.  Strong central standards and close understanding of costs are required and it can prove very difficult to implement with many different autonomous organisations making decisions on IT infrastructure that ultimately have to work together to make the system work for patients and tax payers.

    I do have one customer service question.  Technology is clearly going to play a significant role in the provision of services to patients in the future.  How within a system that is specifically and intentionally designed to provide a standard level of service to all patients can the UK government ensure a consistent level of service across the nation.  What happens if the North West implement IT 200% more effectively than the South West?   Will citizens from the South West have to travel 500 miles to the North West to receive more effective care?

    Popularity: 1% [?]

    Does OCS have a new name?

    Rumours are swirling tonight that Microsoft are about to change the name of their OCS software when they release Wave14.  The blogoshpere is divided.  Tom Keating says no, Mary Jo Foley says yes, – the entire product will receive a new name.  Who is right….we shall see.

    Popularity: 1% [?]

    Gartner Analyst – Is UC the biggest scam since Ponzi?

    So I couldn’t help myself.  Nick Jones of Gartner has just released a small polemic entitled “Is UC the biggest scam since Ponzi?”  I had to repsond, while the UC industry is by no means perfect  I see organisations who successfully implement UC on a daily basis and they gain significant business value on a multi billion global scale.  How can they be involved in a Ponzi scheme.  My response to Nick is below, as is the link to the original article.
    Hi Nick
    I can certainly agree with you on three areas:
    1 – consumer software is currently innovating faster than enterprise software
    2 – The likes of MS and Cisco are attempting to repeat age old practises of driving customers into a one way alley
    3 – Vendors who use business cases based on micro productivity as a primary means of justification for IT implementation should be viewed with scorn
    Such complaints are not specific to UC, they happen across the entire IT landscape.  You’d have a slightly stronger case if you broadened the title to “Is IT the largest scam since a Ponzi scheme”
    But your specific attack on UC falls down on at least two areas.  Firstly you have not defined UC.  How can you attack something with which you fail to define?
    Secondly are you really so confident in your assumption that you can make an unassailable case?  I can certainly find plenty of organisations who have implemented UC badly and are likely to contribute to your case.
    However I also know of large global organisations who have implemented UC successfully and has been measured by specific business led objectives and outcomes.  Marty rightly points out that a successful UC implementation can lead to significant competitive advantage, is it therefore no wonder that organisations who are successfully implementing UC keep their competitive success story relatively quiet?  I want my IT department to successfully implement UC and I don’t want them telling everyone in the world how they are doing it.
    Interestingly in my experience I find organisations which tend to fail at implementing UC share similar characteristics.  Often they follow the IT herd mentality (so they are getting very excited over cloud at the moment) and more often than not they listen and follow overly  generic advice from analysts who have limited experience in a subject matter.
    More than happy to discuss further if you would like…perhaps you could let us know who is leading the case for the defence?

    Popularity: 2% [?]