<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Simon Leyland &#187; Unified Communications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simonleyland.com/category/unified-communications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simonleyland.com</link>
	<description>Simon&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:15:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>UK Government scrap National IT Healthcare Scheme</title>
		<link>http://www.simonleyland.com/2010/09/uk-government-scrap-national-it-healthcare-scheme/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simonleyland.com/2010/09/uk-government-scrap-national-it-healthcare-scheme/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Use Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telehealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonleyland.com/?p=363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The UK government today brought an end to the national IT healthcare scheme stating that IT decisions should be made at a local level.  The £12billion programme has received significant criticism since inception for increasing costs, limited functionality and poor delivery.  I have never worked directly in the programme so can not comment on these [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UK government today brought an end to the national IT healthcare scheme stating that IT decisions should be made at a local level.  The £12billion programme has received significant criticism since inception for increasing costs, limited functionality and poor delivery.  I have never worked directly in the programme so can not comment on these criticisms but I do have several questions.</p>
<p>Will there be a central set of standards published that all health providers must adhere to?  To give an example all health organisations will eventually deploy Instant Messaging and Presence.  Given that all the health organisations need to communicate will there be a central standard?  What happens if a surgery has Sametime, a hospital has Jabber and the trust has OCS?  Without central standards the IT provision within the system we be chaotic.</p>
<p>How will de-centralised costs be tracked?  While centralised costs by their very nature create large top line figures that can attract significant attention.  De-centralised costs are extremely difficult to track and monitor, how will we know that the health organisations are procuring effectively?</p>
<p>Again no idea if this is the right thing for the UK government to do, I just hope they understand the ramifications of their decisions.  Strong central standards and close understanding of costs are required and it can prove very difficult to implement with many different autonomous organisations making decisions on IT infrastructure that ultimately have to work together to make the system work for patients and tax payers.</p>
<p>I do have one customer service question.  Technology is clearly going to play a significant role in the provision of services to patients in the future.  How within a system that is specifically and intentionally designed to provide a standard level of service to all patients can the UK government ensure a consistent level of service across the nation.  What happens if the North West implement IT 200% more effectively than the South West?   Will citizens from the South West have to travel 500 miles to the North West to receive more effective care?</p>
<img src="http://www.simonleyland.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=363&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simonleyland.com/2010/09/uk-government-scrap-national-it-healthcare-scheme/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does OCS have a new name?</title>
		<link>http://www.simonleyland.com/2010/09/does-ocs-have-a-new-name/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simonleyland.com/2010/09/does-ocs-have-a-new-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 21:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UC Vendors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unified Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lync?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonleyland.com/?p=358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rumours are swirling tonight that Microsoft are about to change the name of their OCS software when they release Wave14.  The blogoshpere is divided.  Tom Keating says no, Mary Jo Foley says yes, &#8211; the entire product will receive a new name.  Who is right&#8230;.we shall see.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rumours are swirling tonight that Microsoft are about to change the name of their OCS software when they release Wave14.  The blogoshpere is divided.  <a href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/" target="_blank">Tom Keating says no</a>, <a href="http://www.zdnet.com/blog/microsoft/microsofts-next-generation-voipconferencing-client-to-debut-as-lync/7331">Mary Jo Foley says yes</a>, &#8211; the entire product will receive a new name.  Who is right&#8230;.we shall see.</p>
<img src="http://www.simonleyland.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=358&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simonleyland.com/2010/09/does-ocs-have-a-new-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gartner Analyst &#8211; Is UC the biggest scam since Ponzi?</title>
		<link>http://www.simonleyland.com/2010/09/gartner-analyst-uc-scam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simonleyland.com/2010/09/gartner-analyst-uc-scam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 22:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Unified Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commentary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonleyland.com/?p=350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I couldn&#8217;t help myself.  Nick Jones of Gartner has just released a small polemic entitled &#8220;Is UC the biggest scam since Ponzi?&#8221;  I had to repsond, while the UC industry is by no means perfect  I see organisations who successfully implement UC on a daily basis and they gain significant business value on a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste">
<div id="_mcePaste">So I couldn&#8217;t help myself.  Nick Jones of Gartner has just released a small polemic entitled &#8220;Is UC the biggest scam since Ponzi?&#8221;  I had to repsond, while the UC industry is by no means perfect  I see organisations who successfully implement UC on a daily basis and they gain significant business value on a multi billion global scale.  How can they be involved in a Ponzi scheme.  My response to Nick is below, as is the link to the original article.</div>
<div><a href="http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_jones/2010/09/07/is-unified-communications-the-biggest-scam-since-ponzi/comment-page-1/?rcommentid=4744&amp;rerror=incorrect-captcha-sol&amp;rchash=8c27a4361809f94393cb66c8d1ba30e6#commentform" target="_blank">Nick&#8217;s article is here</a></div>
<div></div>
<div>Hi Nick</div>
<div id="_mcePaste"></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">I can certainly agree with you on three areas:</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">1 &#8211; consumer software is currently innovating faster than enterprise software</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">2 &#8211; The likes of MS and Cisco are attempting to repeat age old practises of driving customers into a one way alley</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">3 &#8211; Vendors who use business cases based on micro productivity as a primary means of justification for IT implementation should be viewed with scorn</div>
<div></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">Such complaints are not specific to UC, they happen across the entire IT landscape.  You&#8217;d have a slightly stronger case if you broadened the title to &#8220;Is IT the largest scam since a Ponzi scheme&#8221;</div>
<div></div>
<div>But your specific attack on UC falls down on at least two areas.  Firstly you have not defined UC.  How can you attack something with which you fail to define?</div>
<div></div>
<div>Secondly are you really so confident in your assumption that you can make an unassailable case?  I can certainly find plenty of organisations who have implemented UC badly and are likely to contribute to your case.</div>
<div></div>
<div>However I also know of large global organisations who have implemented UC successfully and has been measured by specific business led objectives and outcomes.  Marty rightly points out that a successful UC implementation can lead to significant competitive advantage, is it therefore no wonder that organisations who are successfully implementing UC keep their competitive success story relatively quiet?  I want my IT department to successfully implement UC and I don&#8217;t want them telling everyone in the world how they are doing it.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Interestingly in my experience I find organisations which tend to fail at implementing UC share similar characteristics.  Often they follow the IT herd mentality (so they are getting very excited over cloud at the moment) and more often than not they listen and follow overly  generic advice from analysts who have limited experience in a subject matter.</div>
<div></div>
<div>More than happy to discuss further if you would like&#8230;perhaps you could let us know who is leading the case for the defence?</div>
</div>
<img src="http://www.simonleyland.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=350&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simonleyland.com/2010/09/gartner-analyst-uc-scam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Google should buy Skype</title>
		<link>http://www.simonleyland.com/2010/09/why-google-should-buy-skype/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simonleyland.com/2010/09/why-google-should-buy-skype/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UC Vendors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unified Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google; skype; google voice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonleyland.com/?p=337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is clear that Google would like to compete with Skype with their Google Voice product.  I&#8217;m just not sure trying to grow Google Voice organically will work.  The closest analogy I can think of is very quick and clear cut competition between Google Video and Youtube, which eventually led to the acquisition of Youtube by Google. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is clear that Google would like to compete with Skype with their Google Voice product.  I&#8217;m just not sure trying to grow Google Voice organically will work.  The closest analogy I can think of is very quick and clear cut competition between Google Video and Youtube, which eventually led to the acquisition of Youtube by Google.</p>
<ul>
<li>Google tried with Google Video but realised that Youtube&#8217;s brand had too much of a lead</li>
<li>Google Search/Account id allowed Google a unique chance to monetise Youtube</li>
<li>Youtube is a massive web property, for Google not to have control could be a threat in the future</li>
</ul>
<p>I believe all three of the above reasons can be applied to a Google purchase of Skype.  While Google Voice is a good product I think Skype has too much of a brand lead for Gvoice to ever take over. To monetise Skype Google could push Skype into their Google accounts and search results while inserting ad words into Skype calls.  They could easily keep the Google Voice brand for their Enterprise apps and keep the Skype brand for consumers.</p>
<p>Imagine a Skype/Youtube and Google TV combination, which can be transferred to a desktop and mobile phone platform.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="Gykpe" src="http://www.simonleyland.com/gyke.jpg" alt="" width="246" height="184" /></p>
<img src="http://www.simonleyland.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=337&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simonleyland.com/2010/09/why-google-should-buy-skype/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco implement Telemedicine in Russia</title>
		<link>http://www.simonleyland.com/2010/09/cisco-implement-telemedicine-in-russia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simonleyland.com/2010/09/cisco-implement-telemedicine-in-russia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 07:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UC Vendors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unified Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Use Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telehealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonleyland.com/?p=332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cisco have always been at the forefront of implementing UC solutions for Telemedicine. Yesterday Cisco released another use case based on their Tandberg platform which allowed a remote monastery to receive vital medical assistance from experts over 130 miles away based in St Petersburg. The Tandberg solution, now provided by the Cisco TelePresence Technology Group, connects the remote monastery [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone" title="test" src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4154/4967887456_c8c4c73783.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" />Cisco have always been at the forefront of implementing UC solutions for Telemedicine. Yesterday Cisco released another use case based on their Tandberg platform which allowed a remote monastery to receive vital medical assistance from experts over 130 miles away based in St Petersburg.</p>
<blockquote><p>The Tandberg solution, now provided by the Cisco TelePresence Technology Group, connects the remote monastery with mainland hospitals so that local practitioners can rely on the experience of Russian and international experts, delivered via high-quality video. Valaam Monastery is located on Valaam Island in Russian Karelia, the largest island in Lake Ladoga, 22 kilometers (13.7 miles) from the mainland and 220 kilometers (137 miles) from St. Petersburg.</p>
<p>The Island of Valaam receives more than 110,000 visitors every year, and the new center is already providing teleconsultations for pilgrims and tourists as well as monks and other local patients. In the first two weeks of its operation, 20 sessions were organized in the outpatient medical room, including consultations with specialists in St. Petersburg and Moscow hospitals. In addition, the center carried out a multipoint three-party consultation with the G.I. Turner Orthopedic R&amp;D Institute in St. Petersburg and the A.N. Burdenko Neurosurgery Institute of the Russian Medical Academy. During that session, the professors attended a 9-year-old disabled girl trying to regain her ability to walk.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2010/prod_090710b.html?CMP=AF17154&amp;vs_f=News@Cisco:+News+Releases&amp;vs_p=News@Cisco:+News+Releases&amp;vs_k=1" target="_blank">Take a look at the press release here</a></p>
<img src="http://www.simonleyland.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=332&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simonleyland.com/2010/09/cisco-implement-telemedicine-in-russia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft &#8220;Communications Server 2010&#8243; Docs</title>
		<link>http://www.simonleyland.com/2010/09/microsoft-communications-server-2010-docs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simonleyland.com/2010/09/microsoft-communications-server-2010-docs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UC Vendors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unified Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonleyland.com/?p=321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Found via Tommy Clarke Microsoft have released several Technet documents related to &#8220;Communications Server 2010&#8243;.  Not sure if this is an error or an early release but for those not on any of the NDA protected TAP programmes the link contains some interesting information about MS&#8217;s upcoming version of OCS, especially new features and resiliency. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found via <a href="http://www.cinline.se/2010/09/technet-documentation-of-communications-server-2010-ocs-cs14/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+cinline%2FNRDF+%28Unified+Communications%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed" target="_blank">Tommy Clarke</a> Microsoft have released several Technet documents related to &#8220;Communications Server 2010&#8243;.  Not sure if this is an error or an early release but for those not on any of the NDA protected TAP programmes the link contains some interesting information about MS&#8217;s upcoming version of OCS, especially new features and resiliency.</p>
<p><a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff770144.aspx" target="_blank">Technet documents here</a></p>
<p><img class="alignnone" title="OCS Resiliency" src="http://i.technet.microsoft.com/Ff799213.92f44373-88a5-4dfa-94a1-7d6525dded09(en-us,OCS.14).jpg" alt="" width="450" height="250" /></p>
<img src="http://www.simonleyland.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=321&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simonleyland.com/2010/09/microsoft-communications-server-2010-docs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft&#8217;s &#8220;CS14&#8243; Lobby Function &#8211; save 5 minute on every call?</title>
		<link>http://www.simonleyland.com/2010/09/microsofts-cs14-lobby-function-save-5-minute-on-every-call/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simonleyland.com/2010/09/microsofts-cs14-lobby-function-save-5-minute-on-every-call/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 09:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UC Vendors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unified Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio conferencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonleyland.com/?p=316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a previous post about conference calls Dave Grady caught perfectly the frustrating experience that occurs everyday in every office in the modern world.  The curse of the first five minutes of a conference call. Microsoft&#8217;s new Lobby feature in their upcoming &#8220;Communication Server 14&#8243; release could be a solution to this curse. The &#8220;CS14&#8243; team over [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a previous post about <a href="http://www.simonleyland.com/2010/08/conference-calls-need-improvement/" target="_blank">conference calls</a> Dave Grady caught perfectly the frustrating experience that occurs everyday in every office in the modern world.  The curse of the first five minutes of a conference call.</p>
<p>Microsoft&#8217;s new Lobby feature in their upcoming &#8220;Communication Server 14&#8243; release could be a solution to this curse. The &#8220;CS14&#8243; team over at <a href="http://communicatorteam.com/archive/2010/09/03/1538.aspx" target="_blank">this blog post</a> give a brief hint at the Lobby feature and &#8220;CS14&#8243; UI.</p>
<p>Fundamentally the Lobby feature and the integrated Audio Conferencing feature should now negate the need to complete a constant roll call.  All those on the call will see who is on the call and the chair of the call doesn&#8217;t have to worry about unauthorised attendance.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter" title="Lobby Feature" src="http://communicatorteam.com/photos/oc_blog_pics/images/1536/original.aspx" alt="" width="362" height="259" /></p>
<img src="http://www.simonleyland.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=316&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simonleyland.com/2010/09/microsofts-cs14-lobby-function-save-5-minute-on-every-call/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So long Stethoscope, hello iPhone</title>
		<link>http://www.simonleyland.com/2010/09/so-long-stethoscope-hello-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simonleyland.com/2010/09/so-long-stethoscope-hello-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 10:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Unified Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Use Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telehealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonleyland.com/?p=312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So when Steve Jobs and his Apple team were coming up with iphone I bet no-one put &#8220;iPhone will replace stethoscope and a developer will make money developing an app&#8221;.  This just goes to show the futility of modern IT business cases but more importantly it highlights how a communication tool (iPhone) that is relatively open (i [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So when Steve Jobs and his Apple team were coming up with iphone I bet no-one put &#8220;iPhone will replace stethoscope and a developer will make money developing an app&#8221;.  This just goes to show the futility of modern IT business cases but more importantly it highlights how a communication tool (iPhone) that is relatively open (i know Steve still has to say yes) to development can help revolutionise an industry.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve said/written this many times but we are only starting to scratch the surface that Unified Communication can provide.</p>
<blockquote><p>The stethoscope – medical icon, lifesaver and doctor&#8217;s best friend – is disappearing from hospitals across the world as physicians increasingly use their smartphones to monitor patients&#8217; heartbeats.</p>
<p>More than 3 million <a title="More from guardian.co.uk on Doctors" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/doctors">doctors</a> have downloaded a 59p application – invented by Peter Bentley, a researcher from University College London – which turns an <a title="More from guardian.co.uk on Apple" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/apple">Apple</a> <a title="More from guardian.co.uk on iPhone" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/iphone">iPhone</a> into a stethoscope.</p>
<p>Last week, Bentley introduced a free version of the app, which is being downloaded by more than 500 users a day. Experts say the software, a major advance in medical technology, has saved lives and enabled doctors in remote areas to access specialist expertise.</p>
<p>&#8220;Everybody is very excited about the potential of the adoption of mobile phone technology into the medical workplace, and rightly so,&#8221; said Bentley, who initially developed the app &#8220;as a fun toy&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;Smartphones are incredibly powerful devices packed full of sensors, cameras, high-quality microphones with amazing displays,&#8221; he said. &#8220;They are capable of saving lives, saving money and improving healthcare in a dramatic fashion – and we carry these massively powerful computers in our pockets.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/aug/30/iphone-replace-stethoscope?CMP=twt_iph" target="_blank">Read the iStethoscope article in the Guardian here</a> the article describes other Telemedicince technologies too.</p>
<img src="http://www.simonleyland.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=312&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simonleyland.com/2010/09/so-long-stethoscope-hello-iphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BT Global Service extend SIP Trunking/OCS Support and commit to savings</title>
		<link>http://www.simonleyland.com/2010/09/bt-global-service-extend-sip-trunkingocs-support-and-guarantee-savings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simonleyland.com/2010/09/bt-global-service-extend-sip-trunkingocs-support-and-guarantee-savings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UC Vendors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonleyland.com/?p=302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BT announced today they are extending their existing SIP trunking capability in the UK to the US, Holland, Belgium and Germany with Spain to follow.   They also extended their Onevoice product to support Microsoft&#8217;s OCS R2.  Press release here BT today announced two further voice initiatives on its converged communications platform, BT Onevoice. To [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BT announced today they are extending their existing SIP trunking capability in the UK to the US, Holland, Belgium and Germany with Spain to follow.   They also extended their Onevoice product to support Microsoft&#8217;s OCS R2.  <a href="http://www.btplc.com/News/Articles/Showarticle.cfm?ArticleID=8D527B5C-BA07-4C1B-9549-0664EAEBAFBC" target="_blank">Press release here</a></p>
<blockquote><p>BT today announced two further voice initiatives on its converged communications platform, BT Onevoice. To enable larger organisations to accelerate the adoption of communications applications to the desktop, BT is launching SIP trunking in a number of countries, delivering a clear migration path to unified communications. At the same time, BT has the global Microsoft qualification of BT Onevoice for Microsoft Office Communications Server 2007 R2.</p>
<p>BT Onevoice’s SIP trunking provides full connectivity between domestic country voice services and BT’s Onevoice global VPN to help customers reduce telephony costs and rapidly deploy converged applications. The service offers local numbering for both outgoing and incoming call traffic that can be delivered anywhere on a user’s network. Already available in the UK the services will be rolled out to the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, France and the US in the coming months, with further regions, including Spain, to follow. In addition, by utilising SIP trunking, customers can reduce rental for access lines, reduce call costs, and improve collaboration for users, whether they be office based, on the move or based remotely.</p></blockquote>
<p>BT also announced a commitment to deliver up to 25% reduction on voice communications for customers who already have a data network with BT, spend £700k on voice communications and then move their voice traffic to BT&#8217;s Onevoice product.  <a href="http://www.btplc.com/News/Articles/Showarticle.cfm?ArticleID=9DE8667A-2FFE-451D-9EA5-E627BB718AE8">Devil of course will be in the detail.</a></p>
<p>Interesting to see another large incumbent telco start to broaden their UC offer to include support for products such as OCS and also start to offer guaranteed savings into the mix. While I fully expect the number of voice and video minutes to increase within an enterprise the per unit pricing will fall dramatically which creates real financial challenges for incumbents such as BT, AT%T, D-Telecom.</p>
<p>(please note I initially had guarantee savings and did not have the &#8216;up to&#8217; 25% but having re-read I now notice BT are offering to commit up to 25% savings)</p>
<img src="http://www.simonleyland.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=302&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simonleyland.com/2010/09/bt-global-service-extend-sip-trunkingocs-support-and-guarantee-savings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Google Voice and Gmail features</title>
		<link>http://www.simonleyland.com/2010/09/more-google-voice-and-gmail-features/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simonleyland.com/2010/09/more-google-voice-and-gmail-features/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 22:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UC Vendors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unified Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google voice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonleyland.com/?p=297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok Google so just stop teasing us poor Europeans with all the blogs on the additional features that can be found in Google Voice/Mail Michael Bolognino just released a blog post on Google Voice Blog explaining some of the really nice features that Voice/Gmail has built in, in case any of you lucky North Americans [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok Google so just stop teasing us poor Europeans with all the blogs on the additional features that can be found in Google Voice/Mail <img src='http://www.simonleyland.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Michael Bolognino just released a blog post on <a href="http://googlevoiceblog.blogspot.com/2010/09/get-more-out-of-calling-in-gmail.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed:+GoogleVoiceBlog+(Google+Voice+Blog)" target="_blank">Google Voice Blog</a> explaining some of the really nice features that Voice/Gmail has built in, in case any of you lucky North Americans who has a Voice account didn&#8217;t know here are a few really nice features:</p>
<ul>
<li>Chrome click to dial extension:  see a number in Chrome and simply click to dial.  In my experience click to dial is the most popular feature when a UC system is deployed</li>
<li>Call recording: click 4 and both parties are informed that the call is being recorded (I don&#8217;t think it is transcribed)</li>
<li>Switch calls: a large number of calls require moving from one phone to another (eg from a mobile to landline or vice versa)  Google Voice allows the user to quickly switch the call from a chosen list of devices</li>
</ul>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure Google/Cisco/IBM and Microsoft fully appreciate that voice remains at the centre of the UC&amp;C tower &#8211; I think Cisco probably understand this more.  If one company can capture the voice element they will have an extremely good opportunity to attack email, instant messaging and collaboration platforms that are multi billion pound/dollar markets.  If Google keep innovating Voice they have a real chance at creating a spearhead for their Google Apps business&#8230;&#8230;now please Google can you launch in Europe?</p>
<img src="http://www.simonleyland.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=297&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simonleyland.com/2010/09/more-google-voice-and-gmail-features/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
